A competitor gets mentioned. What can you learn from it?
Tobias Raddatz
The same competitor appears in the answer again. It is frustrating, but it does not explain why that provider was selected. Review counts and name recognition are possible explanations rather than demonstrated causes.
Save the answer
Record the exact question, provider and time. Read the qualifications too: is the competitor recommended broadly, or only for a particular budget, location or use case?
Open the cited sources. A comparison page may use different criteria from your sales team. It might quote an obsolete price, or it might answer a relevant question your own website leaves unanswered.
Name the gap precisely
“More content” is not yet a useful task. “Our integration page does not explain data import” is. So is an incorrect entry in an important directory that can be corrected factually.
Use the same questions and provider when comparing brands. A specialist question about your company and a general recommendation question about a competitor describe different situations.
Observe again after the change
Record what changed and when. Later answers can show whether the pattern changed. They do not, by themselves, establish that this particular action caused it.
An unchanged result is information too. It is a reason to revisit the finding rather than rewrite the same text again without learning anything new.
More from the magazine
What teams say about KI Score
“We finally see week by week where our brand shows up in ChatGPT and Perplexity.”
“The score finally gave us one number the whole team actually understands.”
“Instead of guessing which prompts matter, we now have real data.”
“Within the first week we already saw which competitor was beating us in AI answers.”
“Setup took one afternoon, not weeks of onboarding.”
“Finally a tool that takes AI Overviews as seriously as classic SEO.”
Measured where your customers ask
Move your brand ahead in ChatGPT and co.
Set up in minutes, your first measurement included.